John Hargreaves’ (founder of retailer Matalan) Upper Tribunal (“UT”) appeal concerned HMRC’s entitlement to make a discovery assessment in respect of his 2000/01 tax year of assessment. For more information on discovery assessments, see our previous article. What were the facts of this case? From 01 March 2000, Mr Hargreaves was the executive chairman of retailer Matalan. He started to spend time in Monaco, and the details of the UT Judgment state that part of his objective for moving to Monaco was to ensure that he was no longer UK tax resident, so that he could dispose of his shares in Matalan without being subject to UK Capital Gains Tax. On 16 May 2000, Mr Hargreaves disposed of his shares in Matalan for £231 million, ...

The UK Supreme Court commented during the recent case of HMRC v Tooth [2021 UKSC 17] that ‘staleness’ is not a concept that can be used against discovery assessments, meaning that a discovery will not lose its quality over time. ‘Staleness’ has previously been argued by taxpayers to state that a discovery needs to be new and the discovery assessment needs to be issued within a certain period of time otherwise the discovery and the discovery assessment will not be valid. The concept of ‘staleness’ has been subject to numerous cases of litigation between HMRC and taxpayers since 2008 and this recent ruling has provided clarity on this matter. What is a Discovery Assessment? The rules for discovery assessments are largely ...